هذا التكليف مخصص لطلبة ماجستير الرعاية الصحية ضمن الكورس التعليمي Health Service Operations Managementf assignment:
للمساعدة في الشرح والحصول على إجابات نموذجية لجميع الاسئلة، يرجى التواصل معنا عبر الواتس اب بشكل مباشر بالضغط هنا.
Health Service Operations Management Assignment
Health Service Operations Management Assignment: Part A:
Referring to the research paper by Ong, Jayagobi, Raut and Chong (2015), Answer the following questions:
What is the area of improvement the hospital was trying to address in its quality improvement project? What was the impact of the problem in the hospital that was the subject of focus in the quality improvement project?
What is the scientific rationale that this improvement project is based on?
Why it was important to conduct this quality improvement project?
What were the objectives of the quality improvement project?
What are the different types of wastes in operations management? Which waste (s) did this study address?
What improvement framework did the quality project embrace? Describe its components and provide scientific evidence about its robustness?
Why were there inclusion and exclusion criteria for this improvement project?
What interventions did the hospital improvement team develop? What were the assumptions that these interventions were based on?
Did the improvement project achieve its objectives? Discuss the results and analyze the effectiveness of the achievements. What was the primary measure that the project used to demonstrate a success?
Health Service Operations Management Assignment Part B:
Maximum 2000 words. 1. What is lean methodology? What are its concepts, tools, and history? What are the benefits of implementing lean in healthcare? Support your arguments with evidence from the literature.
Health Service Operations Management Assignment: Abstract: Anaerobic blood cultures are no longer routinely performed due to a decrease in anaerobic infections over the past 15 years. A 10-year period from 2001 to 2010 was used in this study to extract our pediatric wards’ baseline aerobic and anaerobic blood culture rates. Doctors were asked for their thoughts on anaerobic blood cultures via a survey. Anaerobic blood cultures were reduced over a period of six months by implementing interventions such as physician education.
The incidence of blood cultures was also monitored over time following the intervention. 90% of doctors surveyed were unaware of any guidelines for anaerobic blood cultures and 100% did not know the costs prior to intervention. Anaerobic blood cultures were reduced by 80 percent by the combination of physician education and restrictive interventions, which resulted in a weekly savings of USD $2,883 and an annual savings of USD $145,560.